Columbia University Libraries Digital Collections: The Real Estate Record

Please note: this text may be incomplete. For more information about this OCR, view About OCR text.

46ft Record and Guide March i8, 1899. ducting Judicial sales In this county, and especially whether it Is desirable and practicable to prevent two or more such sales being held at tne same time, and that the Committee report hereon, together with any proposed lesislation on the subject, at a future meeting of the Association." To a representative of the Record and Guide the mover of the resolution said; "The resolution looks to the abolition of the system thathasbeen so long in vogue in this county of having all Judicial sales of real estate held at 12 o'clock. It is not so material that the sales should be held at a particular hour, as that they be held con¬ secutively and separately instead of simultaneously. It is as if flve or six or eight causes should be tried at the same time and in the same court room. While the argument applies with the same reason to all auction sales of realty, of course the Associa¬ tion of the Bar, and the Bar at large can only take cognizance of the subject of judicial sales, and there certainly is nothing judi¬ cial In the methods of the modern real estate aucLion room, where any number, from two to ten, auctioneers are al! selling at the same time. There is probably among laymen an impression that the law requires that real estate should be sold always at noon time, but this is an erroneous idea. It was suggested by some member of the Association the other evening that it would be necessary to go to the'Legislature in order to change the present system, but that is not so, as the Judges of the Appellate Di¬ vision are authorized to regulate the whole general conduct of judicial sales. I think also that there can be a Judicious prun¬ ing of the Terms of bale." Mr. Levi was asked if he had any practical plan by which he thought this change could be effected, to which he replied that he had, but that he felt it would be improper for him to state it until the matter has been reported by the Standing Committee to the Bar Association. THE WEST END ASSOCIATION. The usual monthly meeting of the West End Association was lield on 6th inst., with Cyrus Clark, President, in the chair, when Alexander J. Howell, No. 49 West 89th street, and Gardiner Ste-wart, No. 134 West 9Ist street, were elected members, and the i-esignations of S. T. Cannon, P. C. Eberlin and W, H. Mc- -Cord were accepted. Mr, Coleman reported the granting of the temporary injunction asker for in matter of Amsterdam avenue. A letter from Richard Croker, opposing four tracks, was read, and another from Gardiner Stewart, relative to burglaries in the neighborhood of Olst street, was referred to the Grievance Com¬ mittee. A resolution was adopted asking the Commissioner of High¬ ways to pave Broadway (the Boulevard), on the east side from 119th street, and on the west side from 110th street to Man¬ hattan street, and referred to the Committee on Local Improve¬ ments for action. A resolution was also adopted instructing the Committee on Grievances to take immediate action to procure drip-pans at street crossings beneath the elevated road structure, better sani¬ tary conditions on that road, and additional stairways at 72d, y3d and 104th streets. On motion, Messrs, Doyle, Phelan, Harnett, Houghton and Leaycraft were appointed a special committee to appear before the Municipal Assembly and request the passage of an ordinance providing that drivers of delivery wagons must be at least eigh¬ teen years of age, and must in driving turn corners at a walk. There w^ere other resolutions relating to the Albany demon¬ stration against the four tracks on Amsterdam avenue, which It Is not now necessary to report. AN APARTMENT HOUSE A "FAMILV RESIDEOCE.'" The Supreme Court—Appellate Division—has held in the case of Hyman Sonn and Henry Sonn v. Herman Heilberg, in which the defendant was sought to be restrained In the erection of a six-story apartment house for the residence of families, upon TSth street, between Amsterdam avenue and the Boulevard, be¬ cause of an alleged violation of a restriction: "Not to erect any building or buildings * * * * not less than three stories in height, and the same to be in every way adapted for use as a family residence," that an apartment house is a family residence. In the opinion i-endered by the Court, of which Erdman, Levy & Mayer, attorneys for the defendant, send us a copy, it is stated: The use of the word family in no sound sense qualifies the purpo.^e to which the building should be put. It could scarcely be claimed that if a single gentleman erected a housa upon these premises, three stories in height, that he could not be permitted to occupy it, although he had no family, in the or¬ dinary sense of that term. And so we conceive that he might let the apartments in the house to other single gentlemen with¬ out it being supposed that he had violated the covenant restrict¬ ing the use to a family residence. Or suppose that a family in literal sense did in tact erect and occupy a house answering to the requirements of the covenant, would they be held to have violated the terms of the covenant, if they let rooms in the house to other families or boarded them therein? We think not; and if not, how does the existence of a structure for the use of several families contravene its provisions? The struetui'e does not cease to be a family residence, although more than one family resides therein, and there Is no limitation or restriction upon the use ot the property save that it shall be used for the residence of a fam¬ ily, and that business shall not be carried on thereon. The pro¬ posed structure is in every way adapted to family use, and will be used by families as a residence; and this being so, the pro¬ posed structure is in literal compliance with the covenant. If the parties had in mind the exclusion of a building for the use of more than one family, they should have ,so stated it In their covenant; not having done so, the Court should not be called upon to interpolate it. OBITUARY. MTOIRABL HARRISON, SR. Michael Harrison, Senior, member of the flrm of M. Harrison & Son, died at his home. No. 161 East 61st street, on March 15th, after a short illness, from pneumonia. He was born in Ireland in 1822, and came to this country with his parents when he was seven years old; at an early age he learned the trade of a tin roofer, and in 1844 he started in the tin rooflng business in Bayard street, between Forsyth and Chrystie streets, where he continued to do business until 1889, after which he removed to the building which he erected for the purposes of his business, at Nos. 214 and 216 East 52d street, where he was actively engaged until the time of his death. He was a resident of the Sixth Ward during his early life, and a member of the Volunteer Fire Depart¬ ment, having been connected with Hose Co. No. 3. During the past 40 years he has been a resident of the 19th Ward. He leaves two sons and four daughters. JOHN R. DOWNEY. John R. Downey, whose death occurred on Wednesday morn¬ ing at his home. No. 19 West 45th street, was a member of the weil-known building firm of John Downey. Mr. Downey started in the building business in 1S70 in his father's office. Shortly af¬ terward he was taken into partnership. Among the more Im¬ portant structures which the flrm has erected are theWaldorf- Astoria Hotel, New Netherland Hotel, Park Row Syndicate Buiiding, Home Life Insurance Buiiding, and American Tract So¬ ciety Building. Mr. Downey was a member of a number of clubs and associations, including the Euilding Trades Club. He leaves a^ widow and five children. The Board of Directors of the Real Estate Exchange appointed Douglas Robinson, H. H. Cammann and E. A, Crulkshank a committee to represent them at the funeral. THE STUDY OF REAL ESTATE. To the Editor of The Record and Guide: Will you kindly inform me through your paper, what books would be the most useful for me to study to enable me to acquire a thorough knowledge of the -Real Estate and Brokerage busi- .ness? GEO. DIERST. March 13, 1899. Answer.—We would recommend you to purchase: (1) "Guide to Buyers and Sellers of Real Estate"'; (2) "Bearings of the Char¬ ter upon Real Estate," both of which are by Mr. George W. "Van Siclen; (3) "Laws Relating to Building in New York City," by Mr. Wm. J, Fryer; (4) "A History of Architecture, Building and ^Real Estate," The Record and Guide publishes these books. There are also, of course, a number of strictly legal works on real estate. PROPOSED DISPERSION OF CHINATOWN. The Board of Local Improvements of the Tenth District met on Thursday, under the direction of President of the Borough Coo¬ gan, and passed the following: "Resolved, That the Board of Local Improvements of the Tenth District of the Borough of Man¬ hattan, recommends to the Board of Public Improvements that Pell street be widened from the Bowery to Mott street, and ex¬ tended through Mott street to Mulberry Bend Park, according to the lines laid down in the map attached hereto," The map men¬ tioned is reproduced herewith, and below will be found a list of the owners of the property affected and the amounts at which the several parcels-are assessed for tax purposes. The object of this improvement is to eradicate Chinatown, and to more effectually secure which an extension of Elizabeth street, from Bayard street to Chatham Square, cutting Doyers street in two on the way. Is proposed. At the hearing that preceded the passing of the reso¬ lution the Rev. Dr. McLoughlin, rector of the Roman Catholic Church of the Transfiguration, and Commodore Gerry, of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, favored the im¬ provement in the interest of the morality of the community, and Job E. Heoges and Michael E. Muiqueen, representing property owners, opposed It. The names of the owners of the several parcels it Is proposed i to take for the Pell street widening, with the assessed valua¬ tions of the latter, are: John S. Voss, No. 15 Pell street, $6,000; J, N. Biggie, No. 13 Pell street, $8,000; C. L. Spencer, No. 11 Pell street, $12,000; L. B, Reed, No, 9 Pell street, $11,000; Will- lam McKeon, No. 18 Bowery. $27,000; G. L. Specino. Nos. 34 and 36 Mott street. $35,000; A. Barbierl. No. 31 Pell street, $9,- COO; E, Lodlam, No. 25 Pell street. $8,000; Sam. Weeks, No. 23 PeJI street, $G,500; B. H. King, No. 21 Pell street, $6,000; J. L^y-